Courtesy of Quicktext
Update: the image above is an animated gif and some viewers might not be able to render such images correctly. Apparently even on the blog the animation isn't visible unless you click on the image itself.
Saturday, 26 July 2008
fast translation bug report via icedove
Here's a quick way to report po-debconf transalations:
Courtesy of Quicktext
Update: the image above is an animated gif and some viewers might not be able to render such images correctly. Apparently even on the blog the animation isn't visible unless you click on the image itself.
Courtesy of Quicktext
Update: the image above is an animated gif and some viewers might not be able to render such images correctly. Apparently even on the blog the animation isn't visible unless you click on the image itself.
Sunday, 20 July 2008
Wednesday, 16 July 2008
OH MY GOD!
This can't be true! How can someone trust such a key?
Does anybody have a reasonable explanation for such an abomination?
Update: It seems it is unclear to some people what is the problem with this key. There are multiple identities (apparently different people) for the same key. So, in layman's terms, multiple different people are using exactly the same key to certify their identity.
I really don't understand how this could work in real life. Maybe is a case of misunderstanding what gpg is about?
Does anybody have a reasonable explanation for such an abomination?
Update: It seems it is unclear to some people what is the problem with this key. There are multiple identities (apparently different people) for the same key. So, in layman's terms, multiple different people are using exactly the same key to certify their identity.
I really don't understand how this could work in real life. Maybe is a case of misunderstanding what gpg is about?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)