Singing your way to Parliament

Here is a "customized" version of a political ad that I made based on the real one of a guy running in the area where I live right now. I made it as a joke, I don't endorse the guy at all. In fact, I think that I would advise anyone having this guy on the ballot, to vote whomever else.

The candidate is a singer part of a band which had it's heyday around the beginning of the previous decade. His slogan is "Facts not words", but I thought "Rhymes, not words" is more appropriate.

There are two other jokes in here, I hope my Romanian readers will appreciate them.

[content:lang:ro] I wrote to my representative

This post concerns Romanian politics, internal affairs and improper direction of public funding for new hideous churches in spite of education, culture, health, technic development and old monuments. Thus I will write this in Romanian. Curious foreigners can try to read the text via Google's translation.

---

Din cauză că suntem în secolul XXI și consider că e o prostie imensă să băgăm bani în biserici în detrimentul educației, culturii, sănătății, dezvoltării tehnice și a vechilor monumente, iar politicul din România pare dornic să dea bani cultelor, am ajuns la concluzia că este cazul să-i scriu reprezntantului meu (teoretic) în Parlament, Deputatul Florin Iordache. Am aflat de ce colegiu aparțin uitându-mă aici și apoi în lista oficială cu deputații.




I-am trimis textul de mai jos:

Mă numesc Petrișor Eddy și sunt unul dintre cei pe care îi reprezentați în Parlamentul României. Este pentru prima dată când scriu unui parlamentar care mă reprezintă în conducerea statului român și o fac pentru a-mi exprima în mod clar și răspicat ideile și opinia în ceea ce privește subiectul pe care îl voi discuta mai jos. Am 30 de ani, sunt programator, am muncit și mi-am plătit taxele de când am fost angajat, din anul 4 de facultate până în prezent, adică de vreo 6-7 ani. Nu, acest mesaj nu este un strigăt de ajutor, nu aștept pomeni, nu am milogit niciodată, mereu am muncit deși văd că pentru unii parazitismul fiscal a devenit un mod de viață. Din acest motiv sunt revoltat.

Sunt revoltat pentru că:
- deși plătesc taxe și impozite care ajung la peste 60% din venitul brut, nu primesc în schimb nici un fel de servicii, nici un fel de infrastructură, nici un fel de respect, nici un fel de eficiență
- deși lucrez de ceva timp, am observat că pe unde am lucrat competența și performața erau o necesitate; în aparatul de stat nu este cazul
- deși sunt destui ca mine care plătesc taxe și impozite, vocile noastre sunt ignorate și banii noștri sunt aruncați pe fereastră de cei ce administrează fondurile colectate.

Domnule deputat sunt revoltat că de 15 ani de zile dispar în medie aproximativ 4 școli zilnic și apare, tot în medie, o biserică la fiecare 2 zile, iar asta se întâmplă cu accepțiunea aparatului politic. Spitalul din Caracal, ca orice alt spital din România, e prost dotat, nu există personal suficient, nu are fonduri pentru medicație pentru pacienți, pe scurt, este un dezastru care e pe cale să se întâmple. Și cu toate astea, banii se duc spre biserici. Se fac donații de școli și terenuri către biserică, în mod ilegal și abuziv chiar în județul Olt.

Ultima perioadă în care religia a condus lumea s-a numit Evul Mediu și cred că orice om care a trăit măcar 5 ani în secolul XXI poate să observe că nu religia ne-a adus mari beneficii, ci știința și tehnologia. În Evul Mediu „tratamentul” se făcea prin „sângerări”, „tăieri sub limbă”, „scoaterea argintului viu” și tot felul de alte superstiții fără nici un efect pozitiv sau chair cu efecte negative.

Între timp umanitatea a progresat și am descoperit medicina, curentul electric, am explorat universul, am aterizat pe Lună, am pus zeci de sateliți artificiali pe orbită, am aflat foarte multe despre univers și lumea care ne înconjoară, am inventat noi materiale (plasticul, pânzele impermeabile, kevlarul), am investigat lumea fără idei preconcepute după metoda științifică, iar lucrul acesta ne-a îmbunătățit viața în toate aspectele ei. Sperantă de viață a crescut de la aproximativ 30-40 de ani în Evul Mediu, la 70-80 de ani în prezent, totul datorită științei aplicate. Datorită tehnologiei și științei pot să vă scriu aceste cuvinte și știu că vor ajunge la dumneavoastră, nu datorită unor incantații sau ritualuri, nu datorită telepatiei, deși mediul ăsta de transmisie se apropie foarte mult de ceea ce definește ca fiind telepatie :-) . Cu toate astea, unii consideră că religia trebuie finanțată pentru că e religie, nici măcar pentru că ar avea programe sociale, contribuții cuantificabile reale, nu, doar pentru că este religie.


Am citit foarte multe articole din presă, articole bine documentate, și am senzația că trăiesc într-o lume inconștientă când văd cum banii care ar trebui să ajungă în drumuri, școli, spitale, cercetare, medicamente, programe sociale cu real impact, ajung în noi și noi biserici de beton în timp ce monumentele istorice, bisericile din lemn, mănăstirile cu adevărat valoroase sunt lăsate în paragină. Asist cu o senzație de dezgust continuu la felul în care ne batem joc de cei ce ne salvează viețile, medicii, de cei ce ar trebui să ne facă educația, profesorii, de cei ce ne sting casele dacă iau foc, pompierii, și, de felul în care ridicăm misticismul religios la rang de virtute. Este de-a dreptul jignitor și aberant ca alfabetizarea științifică în secolul XXI să fie atât de joasă încât să avem 42% din populație care cred că Terra este centrul universului, să avem oameni care cred că astrologia este științifică, să NU avem nici măcar o universitate în top 500 în lume, este jignitor să fim în permanență în coada tuturor clasamentelor pozitive și în fruntea tuturor celor negative.

Recent money.ro a publicat un articol în care esitma foarte conservator că averea Bisericii Ortodoxe Române se învârte la peste 3 miliarde de euro, are scutiri de impozite, are zeci de afaceri și cu toate acestea, statul continuă să scutească cultele de impozite, ba chiar le oferă bani într-una. La o asemenea avere nu cred că mai poate fi vorba de necesitatea finanțării de către stat. Oamenii pot decide să doneze direct către bisericile lor bani și nici nu mai implică pierderile inerente ce apar datorită administrării fondurilor de către stat.


Statul nu este un organ aparte, statul trebuie să muncească pentru mine, cetățeanul, iar eu sunt împotriva acestui tip de batjocorire și înapoiere voluntară a noastră îndreptată împotriva noastră. Alexandru Ioan Cuza a secularizat averile mănăstirilor închinate celor de la muntele Athos, deci unor terți extreni țării, așa cum aflăm din scrierile istoricului A.D. Xenopol, deci nu există nici o obligație a statului să finanțeze o instituție anacronistică:

A.D. Xenopol „Domnia lui Cuza Vodă Vol.I”, „CAP. VIII. AI doile minister Cogalniceanu Secularizarea”, pagina 291:

«Nu vom atinge de cît împrejurările care au condus la redobîndirea averilor, ajunse în stăpânirea călugărilor străini, atingînd chestiunea închinărei mănăstirilor pănîntene către acele din Răsărit, numai întru cît va fi de nevoie, spre a înțalege măsura secularizărei însuși.»

Din aceste motive și multe altele, deoarece sunteți și reprezentantul meu în Parlamentul României, vă cer ca să votați pentru proiectul de lege inițiat de domnul Prigoană în ceea ce privește tăierea finanțării personalui clerical de către stat și cât și a altor legi care ar putea duce la eliminarea privilegiilor pe care le au cultele, în condițiile în care singurul motiv real și corect pentru care o entitate ar putea beneficia de scutiri de taxe sau privilegii fiscale sunt doar cele ce nu urmăresc interesul financiar și, totodată, au un impact social cuantificabil în mod clar.


Dacă doriți, aș fi bucuros să vă răspund la eventualele întrebări sau neclarități în ceea ce am scris, dacă este nevoie.

Vă mulțumesc anticipat!

L-am trimis joi, încă n-am primit răspuns de nici un fel. Pasul doi e să sun. Măcar să înnebunească dacă tot sunt nesimțiți. Așa că, puteți afla de ce colegiu aparțineți și apoi puteți identifica pe cel/cea ce vă reprezintă în Parlament. Scrieți-le, sunați-i, a venit momentul măcar să se enerveze, dacă nu să-și facă măcar o poleială de datorie.

Busy, busy, busy and lazy me

It has been quite some time since my last post. I have been involved in quite a few things and the last part of 2009 which left no time for anything else. At the begining of 2010, just to set things on a good tone from the new year, I went on a snowboarding vacation to Austria to Kitzbühel.

Presidential campaign and pure irrationality in Romania

I got involved in Remus Cernea's presidential campaign, which was quite a success, considering the media blockade he was subject to. Unfortunately, Romanians seem to more and more indoctrinated, idiotic and gullible, probably thanks to newer generations that come through public schools after 12 years of religious indctrination and media promoting stupidity, non-values, ignorance and so on.

The more I live in this country, the more I realize how I don't feel like fitting in, because I refuse to be a mindless sheep, a moron, listening to anything the news at 5 say (those living in Romania know what I mean). I obstinately form my own ideas and question everything.

Significant event in my life

In September 2009 a life-turning event took place in my life - don't worry, is nothing bad, is pure good - and my eyes opened entirely. I have bacame a sponge trying to know more and more and this has helped me see the world with new eyes, from a new perspective, without lies or preconceptions.

Now I am thingking freely.


I am sorry for not going into details, but I have my reasons. Those who have the eyes and brains to understand what I am talking about, surely have understood by now what has happened to me ;-) .

Snowboarding vacation

At the begining of this year I went with my wife and some friends to Austria for a vacation. Kitzbühel's slopes and conditions were very good (bad points were only due to a couple of areas where snowboarders had to open at least one binding).


View Larger Map

Weather was good and snow was icy only late in the afternoon. I was quite suprised to see stores close at 6pm, but overall, it was a well deserved vacation and I enjoyed it very much. My wife's skills on the board got better, although the third day some beginner skyer broke one of the bindings of my wife's snowboard and she had to use a rental instead. The rental was a quite new Burton board and Otilia got used to it and liked to the extent that we decided the next board we buy (for either of us) will be a Burton.

Did it worth it to drive 1500 km (roughly 1000 miles for the metric system challenged people :-P) for this vacation? Definitely! Did I enjoy the drive? Well, let's just say that the 950km from Kitzbühel to the Romanian border were made in approximately the same time it took us to make the last 550km to Bucharest, while 110km of those last were on the A1 "highway".

I'll probably put some photos from my vacation somewhere on the intenets, but don't hold your breath :-P .

Instead of conclusions

I know I promissed a lot of people to take care of some things like Wormux and some kernel bug debugging and I didn't kept my promise. I appologise, yet I don't expect anyone to accept my appologies. I am still unsure when I'll get back to that. I still care for Debian, yet the day has only 24 hours and I have to use at least 7 of those on sleep.

Vote at the presidential elections!

Yesterday was the last day of presidential campaign, the most poisonous campaign since 1989, when the communist rule has fallen ... or so says history.

This campaign period was one of firsts of all kinds, mostly bad.

This is the first presidential campaign:

• when, as a voter, one could clearly see polls were doctored massively as a means to influence the voters
• when the internet was crucial and almost the only means of spreading ideas for the campaign of a candidate, Remus Cernea
• in which an important internet news site, hotnews.ro, decided not to publish polls anymore
• when the public television didn't perform its duty to organise a debate with all the candidates at the same time
• when candidates were separated in two groups: "insignificant candidates" and "important candidates"
• when some candidates refused to participate in public debates, except on their own terms, as if it was a service done by them to others
• when candidates accused each other of being afraid to participate in face to face debates, while it was clear that this was true for many
  
• when a candidate, Remus Cernea, was kicked out of a debate where he was previously invited, without being given a reason
• when journalists' investigations found that all major parties had during the last year donations from at least 100 politicians with a declared income lower or identical to the donated sums totalling up to 91 millions of new lei (RON) (approximately 22 million euros)
• when we have proof directly from frauders that all major parties prepared to fraud the elections via electoral tourism, electoral bribes and vote purchase
• when a referendum was used as a electoral means by one of the candidates
• when opponents twisted and re-twisted others' electoral message
• when an illegitimate organisation organised a debate with only the first three candidates
• when it was announced that special polling stations were made to target people voting away from home, not allowing such voting on special lists in regular polling stations; also the special polling stations will be, for the first time, monitored via webcams which will record the voters when they insert the bulletin
• when some candidates clearly stole ideas from others mid-campaign
  
• when I decided I am going to vote out of conviction and cast a positive vote for Remus Cernea

This is the first time I realise how important it is for everybody to go and cast a vote for the candidate they prefer to dilute the effects of the frauds.

Go and vote for the candidate you agree the most!

Don't cast a "useful vote", otherwise you will disservice your prefered candidate in three ways:

• you're strentghning one of the adversaries
• your prefered candidate will be in a worse position to negotiate with others the implementation of some of the points on his platform in case he doesn't win
• you're canceling one of the votes somebody did vote for the one you prefer

Don't forget, tomorrow, the 22nd of November spare some 15-30 minutes and vote for the person that represents you most! Don't follow the flock, vote sincerely!


Vote, because your vote counts! Otherwise why would they bother to convince you to vote for them?

Presidential debate

I can't believe this happened. It seems the important presidential candidates have agreed for a face to face debate. I am leaning to thinking that the questions are prepared in advance, but that's better than no debate.

The debate will take place today, 14th of November at 15:00, but I am unsure if this will be broadcasted live since is not clear from the article.

Mircea Geoană challenged Traian Băsescu to the debate, the later accepted but considered normal the liberal candidate should be there. Crin Antonescu accepted the challenge, too. Remus Cernea confirmed his presence, too. The funny thing is that Mircea Geoană will not participate.


So, I hope some television will broadcast this live at 15:00.

Know your rights!

It is only a few days since my last post about the referendum which is due to happen on the same day as the Presidential elections, but I am forced to make another post because there are lots of incorrect views on the subject.

So let's try take the issues one by one and see what is the problem with every one of them, using reason and the information we have available from more mature democracies than Romania's.

What's the referendum about

The referendum, in this case, is about two issues:

• reducing the number of representatives (deputies and senators)
• transforming the Parliament from a two-chamber Parliament into a one chamber Parliament
  

Information on the subject

For an election such as the referendum (basically asking the population on a subject of national importance) every citizen has the right to be correctly informed about the options of the referendum, what each implies, what are the pros and cons for every option, what problems does the referendum tries to resolve.

There is no information on the subject, no videos, no spots, no fliers, nothing, just biased posters (I'll explain later).

Debate on the subject

In order to have a correct information, a clear public debate which should happen, without the pressure of a presidential campaign at the same time as the debate.


Well, we have no debate, so I guess there is no problem of overlapping (sad, but true), but on the other hand, there is no information on the subject.

Analysis of the options

Now let's analyse the two proposed measures in opposition to the current situation.

1. reducing the number of representatives
• pros
• reducing costs
• minorities have a bigger influence (they can defend their rights - see comments for explanations)
  
• cons
• easier to corrupt (obtaining a corrupt 5% in a 300 seats parliament is easier than in a 500 seats parliament)
  
• minorities have a bigger influence (they are disproportionally powerful, in regard to the population they represent - see comments)
• absence of a representative with a big vote power could allow passing an abusive law (to pass a regular law there is a need of a majority relative to the number of present representatives, not the total number), but, in a numerous parliament, the absence of a person isn't that risky (other colleagues would be present to stop the abusive initiative)
2. one chamber instead of two
   
• pros
  
• faster processing of decisions
• less bureaucratic
  
• cons
  
• in the current system there can be a passive vote (law passes silently if not discussed) which has just one occasion to be caught, while in the current system silent passing is allowed only in one of the chambers, but needs to be discussed in the other
• there is a chance that one chamber might amend/catch abusive initiatives with "two chambers", but with "one chamber" there is one chance only
• more prone to power abuse
  

So, there are pros and cons for all solutions, but now we can make an informed decision and know the risks for each option.

This shouldn't have been taken in haste without any public debate.


I don't want to influence anyone's vote, so I'll abstain from telling my options.

The president has the right to associate his image with one of the options.

OK, let's analyse that.

The law doesn't explicitly forbids this, but there are some recommendations from Venice on fair elections (sorry, I couldn't find the link) which say that in a vote such as the presidential elections there shouldn't be an unfair advantage for one of the candidates. Why is that relevant? Because the current president actually uses the referendum as his campaign and he's speculating people's innate hatred for political figures.

His election material is only comprised of virulent attacks at the representatives or calls to the population to vote in favour of both questions.


Why is that unfair? Because the current president is using his current position (president) as launch ramp for his campaign as a candidate.

OTOH, if the seal of the presidency was used instead his face, the problem wouldn't have been that bad.


Organisational issues

There were various rumours about how the voting will take place. Here is a list of things I heard:

1. there will be a single list for both presidential elections and referendum and there will be a single column for signature to confirm your presence at vote
2. there will be one paper, but two columns for signatures
3. no matter what the list looks like, you'll be given both sets of ballots, but you can annul the one you don't want to vote on

All the variants above are incorrect from a democratic pov, but to different degrees:

1. a single signature covering for either of the vaiants "presidential vote only", "refrendum only", "both" asks for trouble because unused ballots in "only" variants might be added later to the valid votes as if they were expressed by voters; since there is no distinct count for each of the ballots to confront that with signatures, before the counting period one could use unused ballots and vote for you on the issue you didn't want to express an opinion on
   
2. informing on what to do in some cases such as "only" vote is essential to prevent fraud; e.g.: strike through the cell corresponding to the the election you don't want to express a vote on, instead of signing
   
3. giving the ballot unconditionally to everybody, leaving you to decide to annul it or not is abusive, because vote is not compulsory in Romania; more than that, this artificial presence burst (even with void votes) could end up validating the referendum since a 50%+1 presence is needed to pass Constitution modification, as we have here

So, recap:

1. favours fraud by allowing inside people to obtain untraceable/unaccounted ballots
2. preventing fraud isn't of any concern, it seems (and could be achieved)
   
3. forced voting might lead to validation of the referendum because the voting presence is sufficient, even if there are many annuled ballots
   

Vote validation and artificial voter presence

Since validation of a referendum on the changes on the constitution depends on sufficient voter presence (there is some mandatory threshold, but I can't find references now), it is in the interest of people wanting to promote the changes to mobilize people to vote.

By different measures the vote presence at the referendum is artificially increased raising the risk of validation, when people, in fact, wouldn't want to validate it and would, to express neutrality, will be be forced to annul the ballot.

Also, a high presence in the referendum might increase the number of voters for presidency, and the people mobilized this way may have a high chance to be biased in favour of the current president because he associates himself with the violent message against the representatives.

What does it take to implement, if referendum passes

If the referendum passes, the changes aren't immediate. The proposed changes are discussed in the Parliament and a final proposal for the constitution changes is made; after approval of the proposals by the Parliament, the ball goes back to population for final approval.

This means it will take a while to see a changed parliament.

Conclusions

Romania is not a true democracy yet and there are areas where individuals should know what their rights are and not let authorities fool them into buying any argument uncritically.

Romanians must learn their rights so they can't be manipulated whenever somebody wants to trick them into some scheme by knowingly omitting issues and creating insane situations.


Romanians, wake up, learn you have rights, form your own oppinion, as distinct individuals, then we might see a change.

Remus Cernea - direct phone intervention at Sinteza Zilei

Remus Cernea called at Sinteza Zilei on Sunday, November 1st:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOzQO8mAm1Y

Referendum in November in Romania - a fair analysis

Yes, is another post on politics, sorry to those expecting a technical one. I'll come back to those, as soon as I get back to such activities :-) .

For Romanians which want a clearer picture of the referendum about to happen in Romania on the same day as the Presidential elections, which are the theoretical and practical implications of the referendum, take a look at this short and clear analysis:

http://packardb.blogspot.com/2009/10/referendum-noiembrie-2009.html

Remus Cernea - First! :-)

I didn't htought I'd post this soon again, but...



Remus Cernea's site is first on the trafic.ro statistics, which is great!

Mircea Badea - I'd vote Remus Cernea

Mircea Badea at Sinteza Zilei (minute 56:50): "If Remus Cernea enters the second tour I will vote him"

I other news Remus Cernea will be invited to the following shows at televisions in Cluj:

• today, 28th of October at 20:00 at One TV from Cluj for about 90 minutes and can be followed online
• again today from 22:00 to 24.00 will be invited at „Direcţia opusă”, a show by Bogdan Eduard at Klub TV
• tomorrow, 29th of October, will be invited at TVR Cluj between 20:00 and 20:50

Remus Cernea invited at Realitatea

Remus Cernea was invited at Realitatea TV and the attempt to ridicule his and Mr. Potârcă's (a counter roma/tzigane candidate) candidacies was obvious. The show was supposed to start at 23:00 and started 15 minutes later, all of that after a huge chunk of air time for a candidate from a big party.

In spite of that and the little time he spoke, Remus managed to avoid being trapped and managed to send his message accross.


For undecided Romanians, here are the recodings of the show:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C02T-e2Gt28&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSqRPBkA2GE&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dACUQnjM85Y&feature=channel

One of the very few shows where...

Remus Cernea was invited and was allowed to say his point of view and his ideas.

Watch here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cEIpiDiLdc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxBah8m7cQA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjnpa3nA5g4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luxRYyKNIaY


Oh, and one more thing, it seems Remus is very popular on the Internets:

http://www.petitieonline.ro/sondaj-s06930049.html

This makes the hair on my back raise

I want the ones reading this and watching this to understand I respect peaceful people and people respecting secularism. This is not hate speech.

On the other hand, I personally checked the quotes and I invite you to check yourselves, don't take my word for it:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=216_1207467783


This has the potential and explains a lot of what we're seeing today.

Remus Cernea invited at Doru Braia's Talk Șoc

Tuesday, on the 29th of September Remus Cernea participated at Doru Braia's Talk Șoc.

They discussed about Romania's current situation, the need for an alternative to the current political class, Remus' book „Manifest împotriva becalizării României” - (roughly traslated: Manifest against Romania's "becalisation" - Becali is a very controversal figure in Romania, an ex-shepard that got rich after speculating on the real estate market), Catedrala Mântuirii Neamului (roughly translated: People's Salvation Cathedral), free thinking, religious freedom and tolerance, the posibility of prostition becoming legal in Romania, drug consumption, education, the young generation

You can see the recording here.

Remus Cernea - how media blocks information

I wrote in my last post about my decision to support Remus Cernea's candidacy to he Romanian Presidency.

The fact is that main stream media ignored for a whole month his candidacy and the fact that Radio România Actualități (Radio News Romania) removed an internet poll (true, not a social poll, but one of the percepted image of the Internet users) from the site www.politicaromaneasca.ro which credited him with 30% of the preferences of the visitors.




Here (Romanian) is the article on Remus' blog in which he talks about this. And no, he did not set himslef on fire, he set on fire a picture of himself as a symbolic gesture against the media blockade.


As a proof that the poll was not doctored, the first article mentioning Remus Cernea in a search for "presedintia romaniei alegeri" is the 5th unsponsored hit on google.ro. There is an obvious correlation between the position of other candidates in the results and the hits on Google.


If you want to support Remus' candidacy, please sign the support list(ro) or even collect signatures (ro) for him. He needs 200 000 signatures to be able to candidate, a task which is even harder for a candidate without a big party behind him.

You can contact me at eddy.petrisor+remuscernea _at_ gmail.com, for more details or you can contact Remus directly.

I'm voting Remus Cernea (Green Party) - Eu votez Remus Cernea (Partidul Verde)

Romania is closing really quickly to the presidential elections.

The options for voting seem to be non-existent and is basically about choosing the smallest evil and I was planning on not voting.

That was until I found out that a personality from the civic society, Remus Cernea has announced that he wants to candidate for Presidency.

He is a candidate from the Green Party and he is in the process of collecting support signatures. 200 000 - two hundred thousands - signatures to be able to candidate for presidency in a country of less than 20 millions.

Yes, Romania has one of the most undemocratic and tailored-for-the-current-in-power election laws. Here (in Romanian) is a summary made by Remus Cernea himself about the election laws in Romania.

A full report was sent by the Romanian Green Party to the European Green Party Committee and the European Greens have expressed their concern about the current state of the law in Romania.



Since I want to support him and since he has been actively ignored (ro) by mass media for the past month (since his announce), I decided to help collecting the signatures. This post is also about making the information flow to the people via the Internet.


So, if, after reading and informing yourselves about Remus Cernea and his civic actions:

• Save Carol Park Campaign (one of the few parks left in Bucharest, a 5 hectare park which contains a monument and which is untouchable, by law, was about to be given to the Orthodox Church to build a cathedral)
  
• stop actions for the separation between the orthodox church and the schools (discriminatory to people part of other creeds/religions)
• actions against non-tolerance based on musical preferences, style and looks - (with the Sophie Lancaster Foundation)
• others

you decide that you'd want him in the election, you can contact me (eddy.petrisor+remuscernea _at_ gmail.com) for details how to make this happen.

Is Romania part of the European Union?

This is a really slim and really incomplete description of the events turning really bad for Romania and severely bad for Moldavian civilians.

• Moldavia calls his ambassador from Romania
• the peaceful protests turn violent on Tuesday (while Voronion recognised for Ria Novostni that they allowed the protesters to control for a day the Presidential building and the Parliament (in Romanian)
• the Moldavian public is kept in the dark by the authorities: the national radio-television doesn't cover the events, the independent media is not allowed to report the events
• in the rural areas of Moldavia no other media is accessible except the national television which is controlled by the Communists
• Moldavian police men tear down a wall close by the Moldavian Parliament during the violent turn of the protest
  
• Moldavia accuses Romania without any proof of implication in the events in Moldavia
  
• The Romanian ambassador Filip Teodorescu, and the Counseling Minister of the Romanian Embassy in Moldova, Gabriel Gaboran, are declared persona non grata in Moldavia; Romania can't do the same since the Moldavian ambassador is not in the country
• Vladimir Voronin announces visas will be introduced for Romanians (an abussive measure since the EU should have been announced of such a measure with 48 hours in advance)
  
• Romanian authorities respond by:
• a ferm denial of the unproven accusations - from what I have seen CNN and Euronews simply don't accurately represent the declaration, and the texts put under quotes - the word "provocation" - imply that the Romanian position is not honest
  
• they declared that they will NOT declare the Moldavian ambassador as a persona non grata and that the regime of gratuitous visas for the Moldavian citizens will not change
• EU DOES NOT ANSWER AT ALL TO THIS ABUSE AGAINST EU CITIZENS
  
• Wednesday protests are quiet but media access is highly restricted and inaccurate information is aired through the national Moldavian Television
• Romanian journalists from Antena 3 were harassed, followed and, fearing for their safety, they appealed OSCE authorities in Moldavia to be able to leave the country safely
  
• Wednesday and Thursday many arrests occur in Moldavia and the Romanian officials requested the Moldavian officials to tell them if among the arrested people are any Romanian citizens; no answer was provided by the Moldavian authorities
• France, Sweden and Czehia and some other EU members declare that they "understand the complexity of the relation sensible issue between Romania and Moldavia" and appeal to Moldavia to rebound the diplomatic relation with Romania - WHAT? In Diplomatic lingo that seems to mean something like "we know Romanians are idiots, but please, Moldavian authorities, let's get back to dialogue"
  
• Today, Friday 10, the Moldavians are called to protests and the authorities are authorized to use real ammunition
• Teachers, university administration personnel, opposition representatives announce that people should not attend the protests and measures will be taken against anyone allowing people (mostly youngsters) to attend the protests
• Russia declares that "the EU has a member state that hasn't clearly delimited its borders" which obviously refers to Romania, thus attacking Romania and alleging that Romania has unionist expansions; EU DOESN'T DO ANYTHING!

Are we living in a parallel world? What interests would Romania have to ever consider that it would be involved in this? Moldavia is the poorest country in Europe, has huge problems with justice, corruption, criminal activity, social security, border security (Transdnistria) and other issues which Romania does NOT want to import since we're already in a bad position by ourselves!


WHAT THE HELL IS EU DOING? Romania is a member of the EU and it seems all the attacks against Romania are not addressed in any way by the EU, on the contrary, EU members either assist passively, look the other way or even allow us to understand that indeed they think Romania is involved.

About the protests in Moldavian Republic

Many people in the western world are completely unaware that in the Moldavian Republic there is an ongoing protest against the current Communist Party which is at power after the parliamentary elections held on Sunday. The protestants accuse the Communists of election fraud and there are numerous reports of dead people being recorded as voters, people which, by religion, chose not to vote, and other several people which couldn't have voted.

Tuesday the protests took a violent turn, apparently "aided" by some instigators which were reported to be seen as recording the protesters, taking notes and, generally, not fitting the picture. During the day the national television broadcasted absolutely no information on the events, and aired documentaries, cartoons and no news on any of the protests. To me, this looked very much alike what the Romanian Television aired during the Romanian Revolution in December '89 when during the fights in the streets of Bucharest the Television aired no images from the centre of Bucharest.

But, back to Moldavia, at the end of the day, sadly, the Parliament and Presidency buildings were devastated, making it easy for the Communist leaders to produce some disinformation propaganda based on real footage.

Yet again, sadly, but it seems under the protection of some of the aforementioned instigators, the flags of the EU and Romania were waved at the highest levels of the Parliament building during the time the protesters allegedly took over that building (there were several reports that the Police forces actually simply let them in, without actually needing/being forced to do that; also the passivity of the policemen seen in the footage from Romanian televisons was obvious).

As many Moldavian students live and study in Romania, some of them wanted to go home and take part at the protests happening in Chișinău. To their surprise, many of them were denied the right to enter their home country. Many, if not all, Romanian journalists were also denied access in the country accusing alternatively technical issues, lack of proper papers (although only the passport or the ID card was officially required), lack of safety, or simply refusing without reason.


Today, the Moldavian president Voronin, accused Romania as being behind the manifestations in Chișinău, Moldova's capital and said it will declare as a persona non grata the Ambasador of Romania in Moldova, and thus forcing him to leave Moldova within 24 hours. He went even further and said that visas will be required from now on for Romanian nationals. As soon as this was announced, it was one of the most invoked reasons by the Moldavian customs as a rejection reason, although, according to Moldavian Embassy officials in Romania, no rules or procedure were known for the release of visas for Romanian nationals.

Also, during Wenesday, Moldavian crossing points were opened and closed alternatively but incosistently accros the entire border for Moldavian nationals. Romanian nationals were denied in most cases (although some Romanian truck drivers were reported as allowed to cross). At some point during the day the Moldavian officials from the customs told the Moldavian students awating at the border that they are offered access on the condition they go direclty home with the buses provided by the Moldavian customs and were warned that going to Chișinău wasn't a smart choice for them. Some of the information from students which managed to enter their home country suggested that is advisable to not enter the country since they were going to be denied of the right to leave the country later, when they were to return to Romania to their studies (after Easter).

What's sadder is that the Moldavian voting system is built in such a way that the vote counting, in the end is done by Government officials behind closed doors, inside a Ministry. OTOH, the international official observed the things which happend in public, but did not see any of the dead voter lists (since they were not present when those votes were casted), and declared the vote as mostly legal and without major or significant incidents.


According to the media, before the elections, the Communists were credited with 35-37% of the votes in an independent poll, while in the exit poll conducted by the Communists themselves they were credited with 42-45% of the votes. In the end the last official partial results credited them with approximately 51% of the votes.

About Vladimir Voronin, it is a known fact that he has double citizenship, Moldavian and Russian and is a reserve general within the Russian Army and currently has a pretty nice pension from the Russian state.


All I can say is that, although the Moldavians' desire to have a real democracy is a legal and reasonable request, the western world chose, due to the international circumstances, to look the other way around and not to incommodate Russia in any way. Moreover, to accuse Romania to have unionist desires an act upon those desires is planly stupid since now Romania is part of the EU and Moldova uniting with Romania is simply impossible now, since Moldavia's economy would sunk even more the fragile and regressing Romanian economy and Romania would instantly fail the EU requirements which would mean disaster for us.

Aren't we all descendants of barbarians?

Only the winners get to write the history, so we almost never get to hear the other side of the story.

I was thinking how many times people who were right were reduced to silence by death by some opposing force?

We, as the descendants of the winners, still hold that barbaric seed of the oppressors, so we are probably inclined to repeat such atrocities.

Taking all of these into account, is this one of the main reasons why we still engage war upon each other, although we, as a race, in the present, could live together without any problems?

The world produces now enough goods and food to cater for the entire race, still, we are putting a price tag on everything and using money, the tool that enslaves us all.

Isn't it time to open our eyes and stop believing the lies we're fed with every day?

is easy to let yourself manipulated

There is this guy whose blog I found about a week ago. He does some really nice and funny sketches mostly with issues regarding Bucharest and things he finds out/encounters.

The fact that he is smart to see some of the rudeness happening in Bucharest doesn't help him notice he is manipulated by the press (and himself) and writes:

"La 6 ani de la 11 septembrie 2001, Osama bin Laden a scos capu' din vagauna cu o noua inregistrare video in care da lumii intregi 2 alternative: convertirea la Islam sau moartea!"

Which translates approximately to:

"Six years after September 11, 2001, Osama bin Laden shows his face out from his hiding place and makes a new video in which gives the whole wolrd 2 alternatives: converting to Islam or death!"

(I won't take into discussion the correct translation of the message from Osama, if the message is authentic, if Osama is payed by somebody interested in keeping the conflict open, if Osama's forces are actually active in Iraq, if Bush is Osama himself, if we're actually living in 1984 and Osama is already dead but the American manipulative government is using all sorts of recordings from him to keep people inside a cage and fed them propaganda, < insert your theory/idea here >....)

He links to this article, whose title might make one to think what the guy said is true (according to the article)...

But, if read carefully is clear that there are a few twists (in order of apparition):

• the alternatives were given to the American people ("urged the American people")
• the alternatives were for the ending of the war in Iraq ("there are two ways to end the war in Iraq")
• the first alternative is escalation of the conflict, not death; that would translate, IMHO, into "we will be fighting in Iraq and you can give up, but we will not", so I'd say surrender/retreat/keep fighting and probably die are all viable alternatives for the first one
• apparently he says converting to Islam is an alternative ("The second way, he continues, is to reject America's democratic system and convert to Islam.")
• but, if we read on we see that he actually says just to acknowledge that democracy is not at all a successful model, unless by success one thinks in terms of a system that achieves the interests of the corporations ("It has now become clear to you and the entire world the impotence of the democratic system and how it plays with the interest of the peoples and their blood by sacrificing soldiers and populations to achieve the interests of the major corporations")
• and more importantly, converting to Islam is not actually a condition, but there is an invitation to do that ("I invite you to embrace Islam,")

So, the conclusion is that it's really easy to fall into the trap of believing what the titles and headlines suggest, rather than what the articles actually say, especially if you keep your head open only to single stream of ideas (I guess you, my dear reader, are smart enough to see what I mean here).


Disclaimer, my analysis might be off, my English sucks, I might be Osama, I might be Bush, I didn't saw the recording, there's a cat on a freezer...